By By Staff Writer
Monrovia, Liberia — A brewing controversy within the Liberia National Bar Association (LNBA) is raising a critical question: is the institution tasked with defending the rule of law now at risk of violating its own constitution?
The debate has intensified at the Bar’s ongoing National Convention at the Ellen Johnson Sirleaf Ministerial Complex, where delegates are expected to consider the election of a new National Vice President — a move that has triggered strong objections from within.
At the center of the dispute is whether the decision to elect a Vice President aligns with the LNBA’s constitutional provisions governing vacancies in its National Executive Council (NEC). Critics argue that it does not, warning that the process could set a troubling precedent for the institution.
Concerns being raised point to the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Amendments of the Bar’s Constitution, which are said to require that vacancies involving senior officials, including the Vice President, be filled by appointment through the Executive Council rather than by election.
Further references have been made to Article IV, Section III.I, as well as the Seventeenth Amendment, which outline tenure and quorum requirements, reinforcing arguments for strict adherence to established procedures.
Those opposed to the planned election caution that proceeding could erode the credibility of the Bar — an institution long regarded as a moral and legal authority on constitutional governance in Liberia.
The argument is simple but weighty: how can the Bar advocate for constitutional compliance across the Republic if it is perceived to be bending its own rules?
However, the leadership appears to hold a different view. Secretary General Cllr. Elisha T.J. Forkeyoh has defended the process, stating that the decision to proceed with an election was endorsed by the Executive Council.
According to him, the move is intended to give the general membership a voice in deciding the matter. He dismissed claims of unconstitutionality, noting that those with opposing views have the opportunity to raise a motion on the convention floor and subject the issue to debate.
The unfolding situation has exposed a deepening divide within the LNBA, with competing interpretations of its constitution now at the forefront. As deliberations continue, the outcome may not only determine the next Vice President but also test the Bar’s commitment to the very principles it champions.
