By By: Alphanso G. Kalama,
Email: alphansokalama@gmail.com
Former Auditor General John Morlu II has delivered a sobering message to Liberians and the international community, underscoring the perilous state of the nation’s political and economic landscape. Morlu’s message, delivered through a compelling statement, highlights the grave risks that could further destabilize Liberia if immediate and effective action is not taken.
Morlu’s analysis paints a dire picture of Liberia’s current condition, citing high political risks and economic instability. He notes that assessments by British and American risk analysis firms, along with indices from the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal, classify Liberia as a high-risk environment for investment. The lack of foreign direct investment and economic stagnation are emblematic of a broader crisis affecting the nation.
At the heart of Morlu’s warning is a critical issue: the strained relationship between opposition leader George Weah and President Joseph Boakai. Morlu argues that recent actions, such as denying Weah access to a presidential VIP lounge, could exacerbate tensions and threaten national stability. He asserts that Boakai must work with Weah, not against him, to combat corruption and restore economic viability. Morlu emphasizes that the stability of Liberia depends significantly on this cooperation.
“Boakai knows I’m right—after all, it was me he turned to when his presidential bid came down to a margin of less than 1% between him and Weah. Just ask Mamaka Bility, James Fromoyan, Amara Konneh, and others. So, attack me if you wish, but understand this: no serious investor will come to Liberia if Weah feels threatened.” Mr. Morlu maintained.
Morlu criticizes both the current administration and past leaders, including Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, for their roles in perpetuating corruption and failing to address the nation’s economic challenges. He points to Sirleaf’s controversial $16 billion in investments and Weah’s lack of economic progress as indicators of systemic failures. Morlu warns that without a united front against corruption, Boakai’s efforts could be futile and the nation’s problems may worsen.
To address these issues, Morlu proposes a groundbreaking solution: a joint anti-corruption agreement between Boakai and Weah. He suggests that this agreement should include accountability measures for both their supporters and the examination of previous scandals, such as the NASSCORP financial irregularities.
Morlu also underscores the urgent need for job creation as a path to peace and stability. He criticizes the government’s ineffective use of development funds, arguing that over $66 million spent on county development projects has not translated into job creation or economic growth. He calls for a shift from “voodoo economics” to tangible actions that can restore dignity and provide opportunities for Liberians.
In his concluding remarks, Morlu urges the nation’s leaders—Boakai, Weah, and even former President Sirleaf—to unite in a concerted effort to tackle corruption. He even suggests consulting with controversial figures such as Charles Taylor as part of a broader strategy for reform. His message is clear: Liberia’s future hinges on the ability of its leaders to put aside differences and work together for the common good.
Morlu’s call to action is a poignant reminder of the urgent need for political and economic reform in Liberia. As the nation teeters on the edge of crisis, his message serves as both a warning and a rallying cry for unity and decisive action.
